| Author | Avsa.eth |
|---|---|
| Discussion Link | ENS DAO Forum Discussion Thread [EP 6.10] |
This vote will select the Service Providers for the next installment of the program, as approved in EP 6.3 and EP 6.5.
Rank the service providers you want to fund — projects above 'NONE BELOW' are approved; those below are disqualified.
This voting method allows you to specify which service providers you would like to see funded, in order of preference. Each service provider may submit up to two budgets: a basic scope and an extended scope. In order for a provider's extended scope to be approved, their basic scope must also be approved first.
This mechanism lets delegates express their preferences not only for which organizations (service providers) they support, but also which budgets they prefer.
Since this vote uses custom mechanics, the final ranking will differ significantly from what is displayed on Snapshot. We highly recommend using one of the alternative platforms below to vote and follow the results live. All these platforms use the same voting API as Snapshot, so voting through any of them (including Snapshot itself) will always result in a valid vote across all platforms.
Link to forum post with UI walk-throughs
Drag all the projects you want to fund above the "NONE BELOW" option. Projects you rank above the line are considered approved in your vote; projects you rank below it are considered not approved. Projects that end up below the "NONE BELOW" line in the final tally will be disqualified.
Among the projects you placed above "NONE BELOW," rank them according to your funding priorities, considering their scope, team, goals, and cost. The algorithm compares each project against the others to determine the final result. The order of projects below "NONE BELOW" does not affect the outcome. Please try to rank as many projects as you think are worthy, so that if one or more of your top picks doesn't win, your lower-ranked choices can still have an impact.
Some projects offer both a basic proposal and an extended scope that could be completed in addition to the basic proposal. You may choose to separate and rank them individually. If you rank an extended budget above the basic one, it will count as a vote for both, since the extended scope is dependent on the basic scope.
| Company | Video | Application | BasicBudget | ExtendedBudget | TwoYearEligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web3.bio | Video | Link | $ 500,000 | $ - | - |
| Lighthouse Labs | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| Agora | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ 100,000 | - |
| Ethereum Identity Fnd | Video | Link | $ 500,000 | $ 200,000 | ✅ |
| Tally | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| Wildcard Labs | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ 100,000 | ✅ |
| Decent | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| Enscribe | Video | Link | $ 400,000 | $ - | - |
| dWeb.host | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ 100,000 | - |
| GovPal | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| Curia Lab | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| WebHash | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| PYOR | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| Namespace | Video | Link | $ 400,000 | $ - | ✅ |
| Unruggable | Video | Link | $ 400,000 | $ 300,000 | ✅ |
| Unicorn.eth | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | ✅ |
| Namestone | Video | Link | $ 800,000 | $ - | ✅ |
| eth.limo | Video | Link | $ 700,000 | $ 100,000 | ✅ |
| blockful | Video | Link | $ 700,000 | $ 100,000 | ✅ |
| ZK Email | Video | Link | $ 400,000 | $ 400,000 | - |
| 3DNS | Video | Link | $ 500,000 | $ 200,000 | - |
| x23.ai | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
| AlphaGrowth | Video | Link | $ 400,000 | $ 400,000 | - |
| NameHash Labs | Video | Link | $ 1,100,000 | $ - | ✅ |
| JustaName | Video | Link | $ 300,000 | $ - | - |
The Discussion link below leads to a manifest file needed to support one of the custom voting UIs.
For the ENS DAO discussion, please see this: ENS DAO Forum Discussion Thread [EP 6.10]
CLOSED