This amount will cover all expected expenses (including the ENS required for vesting on 5.19 and 5.21) while maintaining a 100,000 USDC prudent reserve to ensure continuity if future funding is delayed.
The ENS Ecosystem Working Group requests funding to support operations through April 2025. This is the only funding request of Term 5. The working group is responsible for growing and improving the ENS Ecosystem by funding builders and projects that are ENS-specific or ENS-centric.
The ENS Public Goods Working Group requests funding to support operations through the next funding window in April 2025. The funds requested extend current needs through to next term to ensure that next season's stewards have available funding before the next funding window.
Voting against on procedural grounds: https://discuss.ens.domains/t/ep-5-24-executable-term-5-q4-collective-working-group-funding-proposal/19801/3?u=nick.eth
Numbers don't match. Looks like this was an attempt to combine executables? Needs to be clear, we're talking about large sums of money here. Voting AGAINST.
I support bundling the proposals, but the title and description of values should express it clearly: https://discuss.ens.domains/t/ep-5-24-executable-term-5-q4-collective-working-group-funding-proposal/19801/6
As the submitter any error in communication is my fault. I am voting abstain to decrease the quorum and allow the majority opinion to be reached faster.
