Snapshot vote - 11 months ago

[6.26] [Social] ENS Retro: An ENS DAO Retrospective & Stakeholder Analysis

For50K votes

I’m voting yes because I believe ENS DAO needs structural change, and a more explicit, process-driven approach for alignment & future opps. I hope that this moves us toward a data-informed framework for experimentation, evaluation, and accountability. I plan to stay engaged and help see this work through if needed.

Snapshot vote - 11 months ago

[6.25] [Social] Replace the Working Groups with the ENS Admin Panel

For50K votes

Although this is primarily a symbolic vote given the current status, I support this proposal in both spirit and principle. I would have liked to see more detailed rationale included, but I believe ENS DAO needs structural reform, which these proposals collectively aim to address. I also support the research-driven approach and do not view these proposals as conflicting. Onwards my friends.

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[EP 6.14] [Social] Proposal to form the OpenBox Investment Committee

For50K votes

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[EP 6.10] [Social] Select providers for Service Provider Program Season II

eth.limo - basic, blockful - basic, Namestone, Agora - basic, ZK Email - basic, Ethereum Identity Fnd - basic, Tally, JustaName, 3DNS - basic, Namespace, Lighthouse Labs, NONE BELOW, AlphaGrowth - basic, AlphaGrowth - ext, dWeb.host - basic, 3DNS - ext, dWeb.host - ext, NameHash Labs, Decent, eth.limo - ext, WebHash, PYOR, GovPal, Unicorn.eth, ZK Email - ext, Enscribe, Unruggable - basic, Unruggable - ext, blockful - ext, Curia Lab, Agora - ext, Wildcard Labs - basic, Wildcard Labs - ext, x23.ai, Web3bio, Ethereum Identity Fnd - ext50K votes

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[EP 6.4] [Social] Service Provider Season 2 Vote Amendment Proposal

For50K votes

Supporting both 6.5 & 6.4. Both versions achieve the objectives set during discussions. Shout out to 6.4, as it's a notable example of the DAO’s ability to coordinate and refine proposal concerns in real-time. Passing either proposal keeps SPP Season 2 moving forward. Thank you to everyone who participated in crafting and reviewing these proposals; it has been valuable to contribute to this process!

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[EP 6.5] [Social] Service Provider Season 2 Vote Amendment Proposal II

For50K votes

I support Proposals 6.4 and 6.5. Both satisfy the concerns delegates voiced. 6.5 directly incorporates broader “expressiveness”. Although it was written under a slightly different social context compared to 6.4, 6.5 still resolves the key delegate concerns and retains consistency. Advancing either proposal will let the DAO focus on completing Season 2 of the Service Provider Program. Appreciate contributors who worked on these amendments and kept the discussion productive.

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[6.6.1] [Social] April Funding Request - ENS Meta-Governance Working Group Term 6

For50K votes

Snapshot vote - over 1 year ago

[6.6.2] [Social] April Funding Request - ENS Public Goods Working Group Term 6

For50K votes